By: Maren Perry, MA, PCC
Giving feedback can be one of the most rewarding parts of leadership. People want to grow, and when they receive clear, actionable guidance, they flourish. But feedback can easily go wrong. Even with the best intentions, it can be poorly delivered, misinterpreted, or lead to defensiveness and frustration instead of progress. Navigating these tricky conversations is where leadership truly gets tested.
That’s where the SBI Feedback Model comes in as a useful framework for giving feedback. By focusing on Situation, Behavior, and Impact, the SBI model provides a structured, objective way to deliver feedback based on specific actions, not personal traits. It’s a straightforward tool that promotes clarity and encourages continuous improvement.
However, like any tool, its effectiveness depends on how it’s applied. In this post, we’ll explore the pitfalls leaders often encounter when using the SBI model—and how to avoid them for more impactful feedback.
Before we dive into the pitfalls, let’s briefly review the SBI model and how it works.
Understanding the SBI Feedback Model
The SBI Feedback Model is a simple, structured approach to giving feedback developed by the Center for Creative Leadership (CCL). It stands for Situation-Behavior-Impact and is designed to help individuals provide clear, specific, and actionable feedback that focuses on correcting behavior rather than criticizing personal traits.- Situation: Describe the specific situation where the behavior occurred. This sets the context for the feedback so the recipient understands the time, place, and circumstances. For example: “During yesterday’s team meeting…”
- Behavior: Focus on the observable behavior that you want to address. Be specific and objective, avoiding generalizations or interpretations. For example: “You interrupted Sarah multiple times while she was presenting her ideas.”
- Impact: Explain the impact the behavior had on you, the team, or the organization. This part helps the recipient understand the consequences of their actions. For example: “This made it difficult for Sarah to share her points, and it disrupted the flow of the discussion.”
Pitfall 1: Being Too Vague in Describing the Situation
The success of the SBI model depends on clear, specific context. If you’re too general when describing the situation, the recipient may not recall the exact moment you’re referring to or may feel that the feedback isn’t relevant. Instead of saying, “In recent meetings…” provide specifics like, “In last Thursday’s project meeting…”Pitfall 2: Focusing on Personality Rather Than Behavior
One of the strengths of the SBI model is its emphasis on behavior over personal traits. A common mistake is slipping into personal criticism. For example, saying, “You’re always disruptive in meetings,” focuses on character rather than the behavior. Stick to what can be observed: “You spoke over colleagues multiple times during the meeting.”Pitfall 3: Neglecting the Impact
Describing the impact of the behavior is essential for helping the recipient understand why their behavior matters. Skipping this part or providing weak impact statements (e.g., “It didn’t seem right”) leaves the feedback incomplete and unactionable. A more effective approach could be, “It prevented Sarah from finishing her point, which affected the team’s understanding of her proposal.”Pitfall 4: Giving Feedback in the Wrong Setting
Feedback should always be delivered in an appropriate setting. Giving feedback in front of peers or during a stressful situation can lead to embarrassment or defensiveness. Choose a private, calm environment where the recipient can focus on the conversation without external pressures.Pitfall 5: Focusing Only on Negative Behavior
The SBI model can be just as effective for highlighting positive behaviors as it is for addressing areas of improvement, yet many leaders fall into the trap of only using feedback when something goes wrong. Regularly reinforcing positive actions (e.g., “In last week’s presentation, you articulated your ideas clearly, which helped the team reach a decision faster”) fosters motivation, builds morale, and promotes balanced growth. Research by John Gottman, known for his work on relationships, shows that a 5:1 ratio of positive to negative interactions is critical for maintaining strong, healthy connections. This “Gottman Ratio” applies to workplace relationships, too: high-performing teams typically exhibit a similar balance of positive to negative interactions. In fact, teams with more positive reinforcement perform significantly better in financial performance, customer satisfaction ratings, and 360-degree feedback ratings than those where negative feedback outweighs the positive. By implementing the SBI model for both positive and negative behaviors, leaders can create a more motivated and cohesive team.