By Nick Tubach, MBA, PCC. There is a simple, yet strategically significant difference in the communication styles of leaders versus managers. Managers and leaders both use different forms of influence and direction at different times. Leaders, however, demonstrate a bias to influencing by inspiring and enabling, while managers are more likely to command and control.
For dynamic organizations to remain competitive, they must foster a culture of growing tomorrow’s leaders. That is a tough feat, considering about 70% of employees promoted into leadership positions aren’t qualified. The very trait that gets many individuals promoted is their ability to communicate and contribute as individuals, not because of their ability to manage, let alone lead. A key tweak in communication style can help turn managers into the empowering leaders their organizations so desperately need.
Have you ever had a boss ask you a question that started out with “Why”? Why did you do that? Think back to the emotion you felt… the second that bad “W” word slipped off their tongue. Your guard likely came up and you might have become a bit defensive. So how does this play out in a professional setting?
Enter the concept of “ego states,” as discussed in the book Coaching As A Leadership Style, by Robert Hicks. We have three possible ego states; Parent, Child, and Adult. All ego states play an important role in life and business. The key is to appreciate the difference and know which to use when. (Note: Contrary to what the word “child” might suggest, many adults operate out of the Child ego state a fair amount of the time).
The most effective communication style in most leadership capacities, the one that opens the door to intellectual and motivational stimulation of employees, is when both parties (leader/employee) are operating from an adult ego state. It sends a message of objectivity, parity, reasonableness, and a general non-judgmental attitude. Respectful of each other in every way. Easier said than done, right? Unfortunately, most of us are experts communicating from the Parent ego state on a daily basis. After all, we’ve been exposed to it our entire lives, starting from early childhood.
Consider the example of a well-meaning manager who is exhibiting one form of the Parent ego state known as the Critical Parent. Again, I’m not suggesting it’s never appropriate. For example, in cases where there is no margin for error with compliance being 100% necessary, it would make sense. But from experience, we know most opportunities to demonstrate leadership aren’t burdened by absolutes. From the Critical Parent ego state, a boss will rely on a corrective, or maybe judgmental style. “Why haven’t you done this?”, or “You should do this instead of that.” The commensurate response to these questions will invoke a Child ego state on the part of the employee. Much of their energy might be focused on defending their position, justifying their actions, digging in their heels, protecting themselves, or just caving in. Another common Parent ego state is when a boss comes to the Rescue. The commensurate response will also be in the Child ego state, where the employee is likely to simply defer to the boss.